IEA-PVPS_T1_35_Snapshot2019-Report

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 - - - - - o o o o o o - - - - - - 4 5 6 7 1 C h i n a 4 5 , 0 GW 1 C h i n a 1 7 6 , 1 GW 2 I n d i a 1 0 , 8 GW 2 U S A 6 2 , 2 GW 3 U S A 1 0 , 6 GW 3 J a p a n 5 6 , 0 GW 4 J a p a n 6 , 5 GW 4 G er m a n y 4 5 , 4 GW 5 A u s tr a l i a 3 , 8 GW 5 I n d i a 3 2 , 9 GW 6 G er m a n y 3 , 0 GW 6 I ta l y 2 0 , 1 GW 7 M ex i c o 2 , 7 GW 7 UK 1 3 , 0 GW 8 K o r ea 2 , 0 GW 8 A u s tr a l i a 1 1 , 3 GW 9 T u r k ey 1 , 6 GW 9 F r a n c e 9 , 0 GW 10 N eth er l a n d s 1 , 3 GW 10 K o r ea 7 , 9 GW U E * 8 , 3 GW E U * 1 1 5 , 0 GW T A B L E 1 : T OP 1 0 C OU N T R I E S F OR I N S T A L L A T I ON S A N D T OT A L I N S T A L L E D C A P A C I T Y I N 2 0 1 8 F OR A N N U A L I N S T A L L E D C A P A C I T Y F OR C U M U L A T I V E C A P A C I T Y 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 0,00% 0,10% 0,20% 0,30% 0,40% 0,50% 0,60% 0,00% 0,50% 1,00% 1,50% 2,00% 2,50% 3,00% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 EV Pe ne trat ion PV Pe ne trat ion FIGURE 7: COMPARISON BETWEEN PV PENETRATION AND EV PENETRATION PV PENETRATION EV PENETRATION